Click Here.
It's not a bad idea. I know it is used here when traders go awry. However, is it necessary to implement a voluntary program like this? Hey..wanna trade...oh by the way...I don't trust you. Seriously, for higher-end deals, I can see it being a good thing. On the downside, transactions are going to take longer.
Full Version: Look Bob! They're stealing a page from your
Sounds like a way for SCF to make money. If you can't trust someone, then don't trade with them.
QUOTE(bigalexx @ Jan 27 2009, 06:52 PM)
If you can't trust someone, then don't trade with them.
I'll second that.
QUOTE(bigalexx @ Jan 27 2009, 06:52 PM)
Sounds like a way for SCF to make money. If you can't trust someone, then don't trade with them.
Ditto
That's a little much I think.
I could see maybe going as far as requiring both parties to purchase DC and post # in thread, and transactions involving a card valued over a certain amount they must purchase insurance.
As for posting pictures of the package, I could see requirement of new/restricted members having to do so. But, someone with a long positive track record shouldn't have to.
I could see maybe going as far as requiring both parties to purchase DC and post # in thread, and transactions involving a card valued over a certain amount they must purchase insurance.
As for posting pictures of the package, I could see requirement of new/restricted members having to do so. But, someone with a long positive track record shouldn't have to.
now say you do a base/low end trade your spending 6$ in shipping for maybe 3$ in cards
QUOTE(skin21rip @ Feb 5 2009, 10:37 AM)
now say you do a base/low end trade your spending 6$ in shipping for maybe 3$ in cards
Yeah, I don't expect that system to last. It will make low end trading not worth it.
This is a "lo-fi" version of our main content. To view the full version with more information, formatting and images, please click here.